This week, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released three major policy updates that significantly impact immigration adjudications. These changes focus on (1) stricter enforcement against false claims to U.S. citizenship, (2) expanded discretionary review with ideological screening, and (3) a restored holistic review of good moral character for naturalization applicants. Together, these updates reflect a broader shift in U.S. immigration policy—tighter security and fraud prevention, alongside a more comprehensive evaluation of individual character.
1. False Claims to U.S. Citizenship: Stricter Enforcement
On August 20, 2025, USCIS revised Volume 8, Part K, Chapter 2 of the Policy Manual, clarifying how adjudicators must apply the Matter of Zhang, 27 I&N Dec. 569 (BIA 2019) decision when evaluating false claims to U.S. citizenship.
What Changed?
-
The update eliminates intent-based defenses. Under Matter of Zhang, whether an applicant knowingly misrepresented citizenship is irrelevant. The mere act of making a false claim is enough to trigger inadmissibility under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(ii).
-
Supersedes prior DHS guidance. Previous policy sometimes considered an applicant’s knowledge, age, or mental capacity as defenses. That flexibility has been removed.
-
Age and cognitive ability still considered—but not excused. Officers may evaluate whether a child, minor, or someone with limited mental capacity understood their claim, but this does not remove the inadmissibility bar.
Practical Examples:
-
A teenager mistakenly checks “U.S. citizen” on a job I-9 form due to misunderstanding. → Still inadmissible.
-
An applicant confuses “U.S. national” with “U.S. citizen” and marks the wrong box. → Still inadmissible.
-
A noncitizen deliberately claims citizenship on a government form. → Inadmissible, with no defense available.
Takeaway: This rule is unforgiving. Even honest mistakes can have life-changing immigration consequences. Applicants must be extremely careful when answering citizenship-related questions on forms, applications, and during interviews.
2. Expanded Screening for Ideological and Anti-American Activity
On August 19, 2025, USCIS updated Volume 1 of its Policy Manual, broadening the discretionary factors officers must weigh when adjudicating immigration benefit applications.
Key Additions:
-
Parole compliance as a positive factor. If an applicant’s past parole or admission request was properly followed, it may weigh in their favor.
-
Anti-American and antisemitic activity as a negative factor. Any connection to extremist ideologies, organizations, or social media activity that promotes such ideologies will strongly weigh against an applicant.
-
Expanded social media vetting. Officers now review not only antisemitic content (a policy first expanded in April 2025) but also anti-American posts, endorsements, and affiliations.
Broader Implications:
-
This reflects DHS’s larger move toward ideological screening.
-
The State Department already screens visa applicants’ social media history, particularly for student (F, M) and exchange (J) visas. USCIS is now applying similar scrutiny to applicants inside the U.S. seeking benefits like permanent residence.
-
Online activity—likes, shares, posts, affiliations—can now directly influence immigration outcomes.
Takeaway: Applicants must recognize that social media presence is part of their immigration record. Posts interpreted as hostile to the United States, supportive of terrorism, or antisemitic may result in denial of benefits.
3. Restoring Holistic Review of Good Moral Character
On August 15, 2025, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0188, reinstating a totality-of-circumstances approach for evaluating good moral character (GMC) in naturalization cases.
Previous Approach:
In recent years, GMC reviews had become more checklist-driven, focusing heavily on disqualifying conduct such as criminal convictions. This often overlooked applicants’ positive contributions and evidence of rehabilitation.
New (Restored) Approach:
Officers must now consider the full picture of an applicant’s character:
-
Positive contributions: Community service, caregiving roles, educational accomplishments, stable employment, and tax compliance.
-
Evidence of reform: Completion of probation, repayment of debts, letters of support, mentoring, and volunteer work.
-
Disqualifying conduct: Serious bars remain (e.g., aggravated felonies, murder, torture, persecution, false claims to citizenship, unlawful voting). However, conduct must be assessed in context—officers must consider the applicant’s current life circumstances and evidence of rehabilitation.
Why This Matters:
This is a more humane and balanced policy, especially for applicants who may have made mistakes in the past but have since demonstrated positive contributions. It allows immigrants to present their full story rather than being judged solely by past errors.
Takeaway: Applicants preparing for naturalization should proactively collect documentation of positive contributions, such as:
-
Volunteer service records
-
Employment history or academic transcripts
-
Tax compliance proof
-
Letters from community leaders, teachers, or religious figures
Final Thoughts
This week’s three USCIS updates highlight a sharpened divide in immigration adjudications:
-
Stricter enforcement: USCIS is adopting a zero-tolerance stance on false claims to citizenship and is expanding ideological screening through social media and background checks.
-
Holistic evaluation: At the same time, naturalization applicants now have greater opportunity to demonstrate rehabilitation, growth, and community contributions through a comprehensive review of good moral character.
For applicants, the message is clear:
-
Be absolutely accurate and truthful on all immigration forms.
-
Maintain awareness of your public activity—including online behavior.
-
Document positive contributions to strengthen your case.
-
Seek legal guidance early, especially if you have past mistakes, prior parole, or questionable online activity.
Immigration law is increasingly complex, and small missteps can have significant consequences. For tailored guidance, applicants should consult a licensed immigration attorney before filing.
Key Takeaways
Taken together, these three updates demonstrate USCIS’s dual approach: expanding enforcement against fraud and ideological risks while offering more balanced evaluations in naturalization cases. Applicants must exercise caution when completing forms, be mindful of public activity including social media, and prepare to document both compliance and contributions.
Given the complexity of these updates, individuals should consult a licensed immigration attorney for case-specific guidance. Every application carries unique factors, and early preparation can help prevent serious setbacks.
Schedule a Consultation with an Immigration Lawyer
We Can Help!
If you have questions regarding U.S. Immigration, we invite you to contact our team at Richards and Jurusik for detailed guidance and assistance. We aim to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information to make your immigration process smoother and less stressful. The immigration lawyers at Richards and Jurusik have decades of experience helping people work and live in the United States. Please read some of our hundreds of 5-star client reviews! Contact us today to assess your legal situation.
REBECCA KROLL is an Associate Attorney at Richards and Jurusik who practices exclusively in U.S. immigration law, focusing on both business and family-based immigration. She assists clients with employment-based visas, marriage and family cases, and the U.S. citizenship process. (Full Bio)
